Re: Oracle versus Sqlserver

From: Daniel A. Morgan <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 14:41:10 +0000
Message-ID: <3C46E286.F7D12EB0@exesolutions.com>

Everyone is qualified to comment on the list. The problem is that the number of people that are experts in both systems (as opposed to those with huge egos) is vanishingly small. I guess it comes down to this very simple question: "Why is Microsoft Corporation one of Oracle Corporation's biggest clients?" And that pretty much sums it up.

Daniel Morgan

Niall Litchfield wrote:

> funny how this list reappears with annoying frequency and is always posted
> to the oracle NG and never to thge sql NG where people who are qualified to
> comment upon it might do so.
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
> *****************************************
> Please include version and platform
> and SQL where applicable
> It makes life easier and increases the
> likelihood of a good answer
>
> ******************************************
> "Phh" <porushh_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:rpo18.73489$HW3.77037_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> > Oracle versus Microsoft Sqlserver 2000
> > SQL SERVER TECHNICAL LIMITATIONS
> <snip>
Received on Thu Jan 17 2002 - 08:41:10 CST