Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Multi-Block read count
The second issue which you mention is extremely important, as it can make a dramatic difference to performance.
Oracle has taken note of this in Oracle 9 by allowing you to collect "system statistics" over a typical time period so that it can incorporate I/O rates into its costing calculations. The interesting thing to note is that it records three things for I/O
Average time for a single block read over the period.
Average time for a multi block read over the period.
Average ACTUAL size requested for a multiblock read over the period.
-- Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Now running 3-day intensive seminars http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html Author of: Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Herman de Boer wrote in message ...Received on Fri Jan 11 2002 - 03:20:25 CST
>There is much to say about this topic. I think it's worth mentioning
>two additional related issues:
>
>2. When performing a full table scan, needed blocks in the buffer
> cache can cause splits in the reading.
> For instance, if the RDBMS needs blocks 11 to 20, each of the block
> in the range is checked whether it exists in the buffer cache.
> If block 15 is cached (the only one in the range), there will
> be 2 reads: one for block 11 till 14, and one read for 16 - 20.
>
![]() |
![]() |