Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Updates on Oracle and SQL Server

Re: Updates on Oracle and SQL Server

From: Garrick Bigwood <garrickb_at_software360.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:40:23 -0000
Message-ID: <JbZY7.45261$Q66.212435@NewsReader>


I don't know why or how but I haven't seen my original posting of this, I thought it must have got lost somewhere so I re-posted, sorry, but thanks to all those who responded to original posting, maybe some of the original responders could re-send it to me.
thanks,
Garrick.

"Sybrand Bakker" <oradba_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message news:jmh63u8jpgdmob0fdjukohfo8r60crf8to_at_4ax.com...
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:37:39 -0000, "Garrick Bigwood"
> <garrickb_at_software360.com> wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I am doing some comparison testing between SQL Server and Oracle for
> >evaluation of possible migration of existing app from SQL server to
Oracle.
> >The tests involve doing full table Updates (e.g. Update table1 set col1 =
> >5; - this is basically what our system does!!) on 500,000 rows. Running
this
> >on Oracle 8.1.6 on Sun Enterprise 450 server /Solaris 8 (fairly old
> >hardware)with files spread across 3 disks , I can get this to run at
about
> >40-45 secs; with SQL Server 7 on a Compaq server with Raid 5 (3 disks)
and
> >1.1 Gb CPU(server approx 6 months old) this takes about 3 - 4 secs. The
> >problem with Oracle seems to be the I/O sub-system and the amount of
> >physical writes done to datafiles and rollback files(also redo of
course),
> >and I'm not sure if when SQL Server completes transaction it has
completed
> >the writes to disk as Oracle has which makes comparison difficult. I
think
> >maybe the big difference in times I am seeing is combination of
architecture
> >differences(SQL Server would only do two writes to Transaction Logs and
> >datafiles) and hardware differences (plus I am not using a Volume manager
on
> >the Unix server). Has anyone similar experience of testing SQL Server and
> >Oracle, is Oracle slow at Updates, is it the hardware or both or ...??
> >thanks.
> >Garrick.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Why do you repeat this question????? It was responded by several
> people as you might be aware.
> No doubt you have an out-of the box install, and if you don't follow
> up the advice given to you, yes, then Oracle is slow at updates.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
> To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
>
Received on Thu Jan 03 2002 - 07:40:23 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US