We have a pair of windows 2000 servers runnning ms clusters and oracle fail
safe .
I found them pretty reliable .
--
Sathish B
"koert54" <koert54_at_nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9oZD7.1803$G43.366_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
> I've never done it on NT/2000 - however we do it all the time on IBM
RS6000
> using HACMP in mutual take-over - works like
> a charm...
> For NT/2000 you'll need a MS Cluster with Oracle FailSafe (if I'm not
> mistaking) - luckely I have one of those in our lab and I'm going
> to set up a test environment just as you described ... it should work -
> don't know how stable it'll be but I'll soon find out
>
> "sueZ" <sue_zirbes_at_fws.gov> wrote in message
> news:3f75e12b.0110310955.10696a6a_at_posting.google.com...
> > We have an application for which we would like to cluster a pair of
> > servers, using a SAN storage device for the databases. Each of the
> > pair would be serving 4 databases, with the idea that if one of the
> > servers in the pair went down, it would fail over to the other server,
> > which would then serve all 8 databases until the failed server could
> > be made operational and fail back could occur.
> >
> > Does anyone have an opinion on this or an architecture like this
> > running in their shop?
> >
> > -sueZ
>
>
Received on Mon Nov 05 2001 - 11:51:42 CST
