Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: feature & performance comparison
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 02:59:21 GMT, Mark Townsend <markbtownsend_at_home.com> wrote:
>Well - this is a little harsh. CONNECT BY predates this by a least 6 years
>(it was in Oracle when I joined in 89/90), and the IBM syntax is not yet
>part of the standard, so is in fact 'breaking' the 'rules' itself. I have
>yet to see Oracle not follow a standard when one is available.
>
Actually, first time I looked at ORACLE (V4.1.3) back in 1983, CONNECT BY was already there! :-)
Mind you, if there is now a standard for doing this, I'd also expect ORACLE to pick it up. Won't take long.
Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_bigpond.net.au.nospam
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/the_Den/index.html
Received on Tue Jun 12 2001 - 03:37:50 CDT
![]() |
![]() |