Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Locally managed tablespaces and migrated rows
Actually that doesn't help. SMON executes:
select
f.file#, f.block#, f.ts#, f.length
from fet$ f, ts$ t
where t.ts#=f.ts#
and t.dflextpct!=0
so it has to hit one block per tablespace
(because that's the way the cluster is
defined) to determine whether the default
pctincrease is zero.
-- Jonathan Lewis Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Publishers: Addison-Wesley Reviews at: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html Anjo Kolk wrote in message <3AF978E7.6B026837_at_chello.nl>...Received on Wed May 09 2001 - 12:30:10 CDT
>
>Or pctincrease =0 on the tablespace ;-)
>
>Jonathan Lewis wrote:
>
>> I hope that was a rhetorical statement - I happen
>> to think that LMTs are a 'good thing'. I just want
>> to see Oracle take the next crucial step of making
>> an official change to the clu$ cluster or to smon
>> so that we don't get hit with smon kicking the
>> dictionary to death every five minutes looking for
>> space to coalesce. Have you seen what happens
>> to I/O on the SYSTEM tablespace when your
>> database has 25,000 tablespaces !!!
>>
>> (Unless you set events 10061 and 10269, or
>> hack sql.bsq of course).
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Lewis
>> Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>>
>> Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases
>> Publishers: Addison-Wesley
>>
>> Reviews at: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html
>>
>> Nuno Souto wrote in message <3af91311.4028559_at_news-server>...
>> >
>> >How true. And we have to live with them, they aren't gonna go away
>> >just because we think they're rubbish.
>> >
>
>
>
![]() |
![]() |