Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Locally managed tablespaces and migrated rows
By the way - a note for Howard particularly.
Some time back I posted a note that you
still get dictionary activity if you do something
like offline, and/or make readonly, an LMT then
drop a segment from it.
I think I said that the dropped extents are recorded in uet$ until the tablespace is brought online and read write. This should have said SEG$ - each dropped extent becomes its own segment. However, this doesn't always happen, and I can't figure out why it happens sometimes - I think it must be a very specific timing consideration that is, perhaps, unlikely to happen under any sort of normal usage.
-- Jonathan Lewis Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Publishers: Addison-Wesley Reviews at: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html Jonathan Lewis wrote in message <989397070.12095.0.nnrp-10.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk>...Received on Wed May 09 2001 - 03:41:37 CDT
>
>I think your argument can be summed up
>very briefly -
>
>If you know exactly what you are doing
>there is very little advantage to LMTs
>over DMTs. But with a little care and
>ingenuity it's quite easy to turn a safety
>feature into a death trap, particularly if
>you call it a shrink-wrapped, black-box,
>3rd-party application.
>
>
>--
>Jonathan Lewis
>Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
>Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases
>Publishers: Addison-Wesley
>
>Reviews at: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html
>
>
>
>Nuno Souto wrote in message <3af7b8a4.4414731_at_news-server>...
>
>>
>>Anyways, that's the core of the problem I had. Education being
>>perceived as promoting the thing as a "blanket". It's not always that
>>black and white. Most of the time it's bloody dark grey...
>>
>
>
>
![]() |
![]() |