Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 8 and 8i default constraint behavior
On Tue, 8 May 2001, postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl wrote:
> Assume the famous case of increasing deptno by 10 in scott.dept
> In this case the correct order is the problem.
I see the need for deferrable constraints.
> The need for deferrable constraints by default is quite clear.
Its not clear why should it be the default? I don't think one goes around updating primary keys very often (I assume this is what's going on with the Scott famous case).
-- Galen I don't want to be the rock. Yeah, okay, what do you want to be? I want to be the piece of glass.Received on Tue May 08 2001 - 15:14:03 CDT
![]() |
![]() |