From: Todd Gillespie <toddg@linux127.ma.utexas.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Solaris vs. Linux sun vs intel ???
Date: 4 Apr 2001 07:22:23 GMT
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin; Austin, Texas
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <9aei3f$28l$2@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
References: <BAAB850F2DE6D553.D3E938F3FC50628C.9F7C5EDA055BF845@lp.airnews.net> <9adrqd$q0l$1@ewok.cse.psu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: linux127.ma.utexas.edu
X-Trace: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu 986368943 2325 146.6.139.98 (4 Apr 2001 07:22:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cc.utexas.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Apr 2001 07:22:23 GMT
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-19990805 ("Preacher Man") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.17 (i686))


John D Groenveld <groenvel@cse.psu.edu> wrote:
: If you already have Solaris expertise, then you might consider
: running Solaris x86.

Except that Oracle doesn't offer a Solaris x86 version, or if they do
they're not really throwing it down to us customers.
And if you're going to pay for Solaris, why wouldn't you run it on the
system with the higher IO? (sparcs, for those who just joined us.)

You may have had some good experiences with Solaris x86, but after mine I
can't honestly say that it's a good choice.  It combines all the
troublesomeness of Solaris with the low-end designs of PC hardware, and is
less well supported than either.

