Re: Pro's & Con's on Oracle & SQL Svr?

From: wayne <no_at_email.please.com>
Date: 02 Apr 2001 12:52:26 GMT
Message-ID: <9a9sma$p6@freepress.concentric.net>

> Oracle is more expensive, at least list price wise, than SQL Server.
Though
> obviously one can negotiate pricing of anything if sufficiently large.
When I

Hey for some reason I have seen drastically reduced pricing even for small installs (about 50+ users).

> said Solaris is more expensive ... I was referring to the cost of the
hardware
> and software assuming the minimum Solaris server to be something like an
> Enterprise 450 with 4-6 CPUs.

I thought we were talking about a small install, not a big-time thing screaming for UNIX. Received on Mon Apr 02 2001 - 07:52:26 CDT