Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: mount points, how to use them?
Hi!
Well, that figures. I havn't seen of heard of any pro DBA that really
prefers any GUI instead of say SQL+.
The purpose of me trying to install into four (in this particular
case) directories is simply to get aquainted with the procedure as
such. My current lab system runs on two 9Gb SCSI disks, and I'm fully
aware of the fact that I will not gain anything in performance,
security or data integrity. I simply want to know how to do it if I'm
asked to install an Oracle server in a "real" server environment.
I'll go ahead and make the install into a single mountpoint, /u01 at
the moment and learn about all the other features/obstacles. I guess
that the performance will be good enough, as it's a brand new machine,
with an Athlon 950 with 512 Mb of RAM. The SCSI system is LVD 160, so
the disk system shouldn't be that much of a bottleneck either.
Cheers and thank you
Björn
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 21:58:52 -0600, "Spencer" <spencerp_at_swbell.net> wrote:
>with a "professional" install, you will get a script that can be run from a
>command line. the "database creation assistant" allows you to specify
>only one mount point. i'd recommend that you save the script files, and
>then modify them, and then run the script in svrmgrl.
>
>the pros use script files. the GUI is for amateurs.
>
>and to really take advantage of multiple mount points, you need to have
>separate file systems on separate drives.
>
>"B N" <bjorn.nilsson_at_bct.ericsson.se> wrote
<snip>
>> I have made 4 mount points available, /u01 ... /u04, but the screen
>> doesn't seem to accept anything but a single one, i.e. /u01.
>> I do know that oracle will run with only one mount point, even though
>> more are recomended. But for the sake of practice I'd like to know how
>> to make oracle recognize my intentions of using /u01 for the software
>> and DB engine, while /u02, /u03 and /u04 are used for the database
>> files. After all, that is probably the way a professional install is
>> supposed to be done, isn't it.
Received on Mon Feb 12 2001 - 03:32:25 CST
![]() |
![]() |