Re: SQL Server, Oracle or Informix

From: Howard J. Rogers <howardjr_at_www.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:28:32 +1100
Message-ID: <3a7561c1@news.iprimus.com.au>

Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message news:953iks$cvs$1_at_soap.pipex.net...
> "Yang" <yg.yang_at_wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:94scp4$s07$1_at_wanadoo.fr...
> > Win NT doesn't offer any security, nor stability.
> >
> > hth.
> > yang
> >
>
> Rubbish. NT does not offer the same level of scalability as commercial
unix.
> *correctly configured* NT is both stable and secure. Moreover it is *at
> least* as scallable as Linux.
>
>

Precisely, Niall. I get used to zealous nonsense being spouted in the commercial magazines, but I would have hoped that Oracle DBAs would be rather more objective and dispassionate.

Regards
HJR
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
>
>
Received on Mon Jan 29 2001 - 06:28:32 CST