Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: What ramifications are there for running two Instances on one host server.

Re: What ramifications are there for running two Instances on one host server.

From: toddthom <orclnwsgrp_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 01:46:30 GMT
Message-ID: <94lc5l$mv$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

Hi Roger,

The answer to my question was very thorough and extremely helpful.....thank you very much!

Todd

In article <3a6cec20_at_news.iprimus.com.au>,   "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr_at_www.com> wrote:
>
> "toddthom" <orclnwsgrp_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:94io0r$nru$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com...
> > Hello Generous and All-Knowing,
> >
> > I'm a jdba and I'm currently involved in building an Operational
 Data
> > Store and a Data Warehouse on one HPUX (11.0) N-Class
 server......two
> > SID's one one node. We haven't actually built it yet, but, I thought
> > Oracle's rule was a one to one relationship with regard to instance
 and
> > database.....wouldn't this break the rule?
>
> It would only break it if you assume that a database is the same
 thing as a
> node. The node is the HP Server -one physical box. The database is
 the
> collection of controlfiles+datafiles+redo logs that relate to your
 Data
> Warehouse, and the second database is the collection of
> controlfiles+datafiles+redo logs that relate to your Operational
 Datastore.
> Two databases, one node. Nothing wrong in that.
>
> You will have to have two Instances managing those two databases -
 because
> the rule about 1 instance managing 1 database is always true (even in
> Parallel Server). Two Instances, one node. Nothing wrong with that,
> either.
>
> Except... that performance on either Instance will be affected by the
 work
> being done on the other, and the i/o on one database will be affected
 by the
> i/o on the other.
>
> So whilst there's nothing "wrong" with 2 or more databases and
 Instances on
> one node, it's not normally recommended for performance reasons.
>
> >If not, what configuration
> > recommendations would you make with regard to resources?
> >
>
> Extremely tricky to suggest anything without knowing the loads and
 work
> patterns for each database/instance. The simple (simplistic) advice
 is to
> go buy another HP Server.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > Todd
> > Peace
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com
> > http://www.deja.com/
>
>

--
Peace


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
Received on Tue Jan 23 2001 - 19:46:30 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US