Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: High %wio problem

Re: High %wio problem

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:28:13 -0000
Message-ID: <977405111.17432.0.nnrp-02.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

If we take your description at 100% face value, one possibility is that on that one day a monthly routine starts running that never gets to a commit. Consequently as the day passes other processes (and the process itself) have to do more and more work to get read-consistent views of the data.

Look at

    v$sess_io to see if one session is running up a     huge (logical) i/o debt

    v$rollstat to see if the reads of rollback blocks     is escalating, and waits are increasing

    v$filestat to see if physical file reads are increasing     dramatically.

--
Jonathan Lewis
Yet another Oracle-related web site:  http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Practical Oracle 8i:  Building Efficient Databases

Publishers:  Addison-Wesley
See a first review at:
http://www.ixora.com.au/resources/index.htm#practical_8i
More reviews at: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/book_rev.html



Dave Weeks wrote in message <91stc3$ar8$1_at_reader-00.news.insnet.cw.net>...

>Hi all,
>
>Quick question regarding high %wio. Every month we get a day where the
%wio
>is so high it brings the Oracle server to a crawl so I'm wondering what the
>reasons are that can cause this (eliminated insufficient rollback segments,
>tablespace sizes, and archiving of redo logs). Restarting Oracle cures the
>%wio back to normal.
>
>We have Oracle 8.1.5 EE running on Solaris 7 (5x9Gb disks, raid 5) and have
>a 10Gb database.
>
>Thanks in advance, Dave Weeks.
>
>And here's the output of the 'sar' utility over a typical problem day:
>
>00:00:01 %usr %sys %wio %idle
>01:00:01 0 0 1 99
>02:00:02 0 0 1 99
>03:00:01 1 2 2 98
>04:00:01 0 0 6 94
>05:00:02 0 0 2 98
>06:00:01 0 0 1 98
>07:00:01 0 0 1 98
>08:00:01 0 0 1 98
>08:20:01 0 0 1 99
>08:40:01 0 0 2 97
>09:00:00 0 0 1 98
>09:20:01 0 0 1 99
>09:40:00 1 1 7 90
>10:00:01 0 0 2 98
>10:20:01 0 0 3 97
>10:40:01 1 1 4 94
>11:00:01 0 0 2 98
>11:20:01 1 1 6 92
>11:40:01 1 0 3 96
>12:00:01 0 1 5 93
>12:20:01 0 1 3 96
>12:40:01 0 0 2 98
>13:00:01 0 0 2 98
>13:20:01 0 0 2 98
>13:40:03 0 8 23 68
>14:00:25 0 7 14 79
>14:20:03 0 8 18 75
>14:40:10 1 9 20 70
>15:00:02 0 7 16 76
>15:20:04 0 7 15 78
>15:40:03 0 7 14 79
>16:00:29 0 8 17 75
>16:23:58 1 10 34 54
>16:40:06 2 16 65 18
>
>Average 0 2 9 89
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 21 2000 - 07:28:13 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US