From: "Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr@www.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle,comp.databases.oracle.server
References: <3A0C0D51.99AD0683@class.de>
Subject: Re: 8i standby question
Lines: 39
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.134.153.42
Message-ID: <3a0d21c6$1@news.iprimus.com.au>
X-Original-Trace: 11 Nov 2000 21:39:02 +1100, 203.134.153.42
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:38:05 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.134.64.67
X-Trace: news0.optus.net.au 973939143 203.134.64.67 (Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:39:03 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 21:39:03 EST
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@optus.net.au


No, it doesn't take over automatically.  The standby has no idea what is
happening over in production.

Would you ever really want it to takeover automatically?  Working out
whether the last of the current redo in production can be successfully
extracted and piped into the standby would take some time; understanding how
much data has been lost (assuming you can't get that last bit of current
redo out of a stuffed production system) is also something that takes a bit
of skill and manual playing around.  So my gut feeling is that automatic
takeover by the standby would be the very last thing you'd ever want to
happen.

If you want true failover and redundancy, then look into parallel server or
failover... and make sure you keep the cheque book handy.

Regards
HJR
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions expressed are my own, and not those of Oracle Corporation
Oracle DBA Resources:               http://www.geocities.com/howardjr2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Andreas Boehm" <andreas.boehm@class.de> wrote in message
news:3A0C0D51.99AD0683@class.de...
> Hi,
>
> Does within an 8i-standby configuration the standby database takeover
> automatically in case the production-site fails? If not, how could this
> be
> automized?
>
> regards,
> Andreas
>
>



