Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Anyone dealt with address not mapped to object errors?
Kai,
I have seen this fairly frequently on 8.1, and
it usually seems to occur when Oracle
calls an 'old' optimisation path with a
'new' Oracle feature. For example a
'parallel fast full scan' being applied to
an index, which happens to be an
Index Organized table.
If you are getting the error on a small number of specific statements, you could try putting in different hints to choose a path, and see if this (a) makes the problem go away, and (b) identifies the combination of object and access path that causes the problem.
-- Jonathan Lewis Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Kai Regi wrote in message <39E8B98E.51BF202_at_rs.ee>...Received on Sun Oct 15 2000 - 03:54:52 CDT
>Hi, Dave
>
>I can't find this initialization parameter cursor_sharing anywhere in the
docs.
>V$parameter view shows no rows either.
>Do I miss something, it should be listed in Oracle8i Reference? What value
>should I use instead of FORCE?
>Anyway, I have same problem with Oracle 8.1.5 on Sun and I am looking for
>solutions.
>
>Kai
>
>Dave A wrote:
>
>> No, as it turned out the problem was being caused by the init.ora
parameter
>> curshor_sharing=FORCE. Once turned off the problem went away.
>>
>
![]() |
![]() |