Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SQL Server 7/2000 vs Oracle 8i
In comp.databases.oracle.misc chriss_at_enteract.com wrote:
> In article <8pbd7o$cle$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
> tandym_at_hotmail.com wrote:
>> I'm sure you misread what he meant - that SQL Server only runs on NT >> (or 2000). >> >> BUT, you can get LINUX for FREE and then the cost of Oracle comparedto
>> the combination of SQL Server + NT is about the same, perhaps less >> depending on number of licenses and support purchased. MS support is >> expensive - WA-A-a-ay to expensive for what you get, imho. >>
The license fee of SQL Server 2000 is not cheap. Because per-server licensing isn't available for SQL Server 2000, you might consider processor licenses, SQL Server 2000's other licensing model. With processor licenses you simply pay a flat fee ($4999 for the Standard Edition or $19,999 for the Enterprise Edition) for each processor in your box. You get unlimited client and Internet access to the server and don't need to purchase any CALs. For example, running SQL Server 2000 Enterprise on 64 processors will cost almost $1,273,600.
-- e-Consultant http://www.asl.com.hk/employment.htmReceived on Fri Sep 15 2000 - 10:53:53 CDT
![]() |
![]() |