Re: Database Load Balancing?

        Well if they aren't concerned about data integrity you could ...

        Your Systems Administrators don't know zilch about how a high performance RDBMS works. Oracle tends to be disk intensive, not processor intensive. That being the case, the way to get better performance is to increase the number of disk spindles and to split data, indexes, redo logs, archives, etc., etc. across as many disk spindles as you can afford. You don't have to go to the extremes that the vendors do for the TPC benchmarks (boy, I would really like to have one of those system with 90+ spindles), but the more disk spindles the merrier. The next thing to do is put as much RAM as you can on the server. These two steps will give you a system that can fly provided that your database is configured properly and - more important than all other factors combined - the applications are properly written and optimized.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 7/6/00, 12:22:18 PM, Van Messner
<vmessnerNOvmSPAM_at_discovernet.com.invalid> wrote regarding Database Load  

Balancing?:

> The sysadmins told me they'd like a setup where multiple
> copies of an identical database would be accessed depending on
> which copy currently had the lightest load.
> I've heard of load balancing on application servers but not on
> multiple database servers. Neither replication nor parallel
> server would seem to provide what the sysadmins want.
> Does Oracle have a multiple database solution such as they
> describe?
 

> Van

> -----------------------------------------------------------
 

> Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
> Up to 100 minutes free!
> http://www.keen.com
Received on Fri Jul 07 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT