Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why tablespaces still need coalescing
By 'THAT' do you mean the MINIMUM EXTENT clause or the general principles envolved with extent sizing. I would asume you mean the former. The clause is available from 8.0 on the create tablespace command. The principles apply for any version as far as I am aware.
Regards
-- Kevin A Lewis (BOCM PAULS LTD) - Animal Feed Manufacturer - Ipswich United Kingdom) <Kevin_A_Lewis_at_Hotmail.com> The views expressed herein by the author of this document are not necessarily those of BOCM PAULS Ltd. Gary <neilc-olops_at_btinternet.com> wrote in message news:38C61900.2C673F3D_at_btinternet.com...Received on Wed Mar 08 2000 - 00:00:00 CST
> Is that available on 7.3 ?
>
> Jonathan Lewis wrote:
> >
> > The tablespace does not need coalescing.
> > This is NOT because some magic makes
> > it happen invisibly and automatically, its
> > just because it isn't necessary.
> >
> > If all extents are the same size, all the
> > holes left by dropping an object are the
> > same size (although adjacent ones will
> > coalesce as the drop take places, so
> > some holes will be multiples of the
> > 'unit hole-size'.
> >
> > Since all the holes are 'the correct size'
> > the next time you create an object, it
> > will pick some of the available holes
> > straight away without having to thrash
> > around looking for a large enough chunk
> > and without leaving odd little bubbles of
> > space all over the place.
> >
> > N.B. Have you also set MINIMUM EXTENT
> > for the tablespace as well is initial, next
> > and pctincrease ?
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jonathan Lewis
> > Yet another Oracle-related web site: http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
> >
> > Wilko wrote in message <8a4c7n$or49_at_inetbws1.citec.com.au>...
> > >
> > >I am using oracle 7.3 and all the extents are the same size
> > >each tablespace. However, the tablespaces still need coalescing.
> > >
> > >Any ideas?
> > >
![]() |
![]() |