Peter L wrote:
>
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:42:06 -0500, K Stahl
> <BlueSax_at_Unforgettable.com> wrote:
>
> >Peter L wrote:
> >>
> >> I seem to remember reading in this newsgroup about a parameter that
> >> had to set to make sure that Oracle really closed cursors when you
> >> told it to. The default action was to leave them open in case you
> >> needed them again.
> >>
> >> Can anyoen supply details of this or have I dreamt it?
> >
> >If you are talking about Pro-C then what you need are the parameters
> >RELEASE_CURSOR=YES and HOLD_CURSOR=NO
> >
> Is this just a Pro C problem? Can we just forget about it if we are
> using PL/SQL?
It really shouldn't cause any problems in PL/SQL. Can you describe a
scenario where you think it would make a difference?
Received on Fri Feb 11 2000 - 13:43:50 CST
