Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.server:79302 Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!nntp.msen.com!206.132.58.120.MISMATCH!gw22.nn.bcandid.com!hub12.nn.bcandid.com!tw11.nn.bcandid.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Van Messner" Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server References: Subject: Re: OAS407 won't start Lines: 51 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: X-Trace: tw11.nn.bcandid.com 946511315 204.117.143.32 (Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:48:35 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:48:35 MST Organization: bCandid - Powering the world's discussions - http://bCandid.com Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 18:52:03 -0500 A few things: For each of your listeners take a look to see if they are using aliases. If they are, try entering another line which is identical except use an IP address instead of an alias. After the install bounce the OAS server. After applying the patch, did you copy owsctl_ent.exe over owsctl.exe? You need to. Run >dir /s *.prepatch.4071 You should see a list of file names and at the end a "Total Files Listed" as xxx files if the patch installed OK. Since your memory is so limited your swap file should be pretty big. Having said that, you realize that 4.0.7.1 isn't even officially certified with NT4/SP5 (although it works) let alone Windows 2000. Finally, running windows 2000, a database and OAS in 64M may not be possible. Van Alex Savitsky wrote in message news:WWqa4.28255$uj2.827066@newscontent-01.sprint.ca... > Hi, > > I've tried to start OAS processes (immediately after installation), but it > stops after giving the message: > > "Please wait while the command is being processed on host ILUVATAR ... > Starting ORB processes... > Waiting for ORB to be ready... > The command completed succesfully on host ILUVATAR." > > After that message, nothing happens (even tried to leave PC for an hour), no > disk activity, nothing. > > Here's my setup: > OAS4.0.7 with 4.0.7.1 patch > Windows 2000 RC2 > P200 64M RAM > > Could you give any ideas? > > Thanks in advance > > Alex > >