Re: 2tier 250users max?

From: Greg Stark <greg-spare-1_at_mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 07:36:13 GMT
Message-ID: <87yabopcj0.fsf@HSE-Montreal-ppp19485.qc.sympatico.ca>

"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> writes:

> There are some comments in the SQL*Net manuals
> that could be read as implying some sort of problem.
>
> I don't have the CD with me right now, but I think there
> are comments about having no more than 250 possible
> connections per MTS server, and not having more than
> about 250 connections to a connection manager when
> using connection pooling where each connection manager
> runs on its own box.

Do you mean 250 per shared server? Or per instance running MTS period?

Per shared server sounds sort of reasonable, I was under the impression that MTS was specifically useful to achieve scalability in the area of 1000 users and beyond.

I would be interested to know where to look for these comments myself, if anyone finds them, or any other documentation on rules of thumb for scaling MTS instances.

--
greg Received on Wed Nov 24 1999 - 01:36:13 CST