Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.server:71404
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!howland.erols.net!torn!sodalite.nbnet.nb.ca!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <38148F6E.39768DE0@nbnet.nb.ca>
From: Glen Gorman <fafhrd@nbnet.nb.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Y2K
References: <7u0g4l$jea$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 17:12:16 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse@nbnet.nb.ca
X-Trace: sodalite.nbnet.nb.ca 940871536 142.139.134.228 (Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:12:16 ADT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:12:16 ADT
Organization: NBTel Internet

I haven't heard of this specific case but i do know you have to ask
yourself two questions:

Is the Sun Solaris Machine Compliant, and OS software...

Which parts of Oracle do you wish to know about, just the server?  You
could be running Oracle 7.3.4 server but have earlier versions of
SQL*NET, on the clients...

akkha@my-deja.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We are running Oracle 7.3.4 on Sun Solaris. I assumed
> it is Y2K-compliant and certified by Oracle. But just today,
> I was told by a guy who said that in Asia, someone claims
> it is not so as fails when they try backup and
> recovery test runs after Y2K. Anyone heard of the
> case?
>
> Anthony
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.