Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Default init.ora (Was Re: Oracle vs O'Reilly Performance Tuning Books)
Kelly Burkhart <kburk_at_sky.net> writes:
| aoki_at_faerie.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Paul M. Aoki) writes:
| | What is "evil incarnate" about the init.ora? (Those are your words I | assume). Is it just missing stuff that a properly planned database | should have? Or does it actually contain bogus configuration?
the latter. but it's not bogus in the sense that things won't *work* - they just won't work very well. for example:
given today's memory configurations,
db_block_buffers = 100 shared_pool_size = 3500000
defaulting the block size to 2KB does not seem like a good idea, since (as they suggest in the documentation) the block size should be an integer multiple of the file system block size and most unix variants default to 8KB file system blocks. (maybe they try to use one init.ora for NT, unix, VMS... certainly this is suggested by the VMS file names in the archive log parameters!)
putting both control files in the same place seems highly unadvisable:
control_files = (ora_control1, ora_control2)
to be fair:
i will say that using DBCA ('dbassist') was a much, much more positive
experience (aside from the itty bitty redo log files). it also generated
the standard $(ORACLE_HOME)/rdbms/admin loads that all you real oracle
DBAs must know to do but somehow didn't make it into the "install"
instructions in the Admin Guide...
--
Paul M. Aoki | Computer Science Division, EECS #1776 aoki_at_CS.Berkeley.EDU | University of California | Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 USAReceived on Thu Oct 07 1999 - 20:36:51 CDT
![]() |
![]() |