Re: Oracle on NT: NTFS or FAT?

From: Terry Dykstra <tdykstra_at_cfol.ab.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 09:09:09 -0600
Message-ID: <37f8c2cc@news.cadvision.com>

So what do those registry entries actually do?

--
Terry Dykstra
Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.

David Sisk wrote in message ...
>Go with NTFS. There are registry entries to relieve some of the filesystem
>overhead (see below). Raw provides 5-10% improvement, but is hardly worth
>the effort. FAT is old technology with old characteristics.
>
>
>REGEDIT4
>
>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem]
>"NtfsDisableLastAccessUpdate"=dword:00000001
>
>
>REGEDIT4
>
>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem]
>"NtfsDisable8dot3NameCreation"=dword:00000001
>
>
>Regards,
>--
>David C. Sisk
>Need tech info on Oracle? Visit The Unofficial ORACLE on NT site at
>http://www.ipass.net/~davesisk/oont.htm
>Like original modern rock? Listen to song samples and buy a CD at
>http://www.mp3.com/disparityofcult
>Raleigh music compilation! All $$$ go to NC Food Bank.
>http://www.mp3.com/whisper2ascream
>
>
>Jeff Hunter wrote in message <37f3d84e_at_defiant.btitelecom.net>...
>>
>>Which file system type is better to run Oracle 8i on?
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Mon Oct 04 1999 - 10:09:09 CDT