Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.server:65097
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!netnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: pascal_revillard@my-deja.com
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: segmentation fault installing 8.0.5 on RedHat Linux 6.0
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 1999 09:32:43 GMT
Organization: Deja.com - Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <7r7urr$20p$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <37d6a9ba.10604936@news.columbia.edu>
X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Sep 09 08:43:06 1999 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.6 [de]C-CCK-MCD QXW03200 (WinNT; I)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 SOREH.Berlin:80 (Squid/1.NOVM.21), 1.0 x36.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 192.168.0.186, 194.42.65.167

I´ve exactly the same problem on Suse linux 6.2
(there was no segmentation fault on Suse 6.0)
...

In article <37d6a9ba.10604936@news.columbia.edu>,
  k_a_h_l_i_l@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had problems installing 8.1.5, and since the
general consensus was
> that 8.0.5 is more stable, I tried to install
that on RedHat Linux
> 6.0.
>
> I get mostly through the installation process,
until it has to use
> svrmgrl, lsnrctl, or sqlplus. All three of these
commands result in a
> segmentation fault. However, svrmgrlO and
lsnrctl0 will both work
> fine. I tried copying these files to svrmgrl and
lsnrctl, and the
> installation proceeded with no problem until it
had to use sqlplus,
> which has no sqlplus0 or sqlplusO equivalent.
>
> I'm not sure if it is related, but earlier in
the installation there
> was a message about ULIMIT being set to
unlimited.
>
> Any info about fixing the segmentation fault
problem is much
> appreciated! Thanks
>   -Matt
>



Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
