| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Can ORACLE do this?
Thanks for the reply !!!
I was hoping that Oracle could do this as we require this type of check a great deal.
What confused me was that our database (Interbase) allowed the Check Constraint to compile but didn't work. Maybe I can talk them into allowing this for the next release.
Todd
In article <7qh4oq$voq$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
kal121_at_my-deja.com wrote:
> No, Oracle cannot do this. A check constraint may never reference
> another table. Maybe in future releases!
>
> In article <7qgvd7$rej$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
> Brian Yan <by999_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > If I understand your question correctly, you can use trigger to
> complete
> > this (for example, before insert trigger)
> >
> > Brian Yan
> >
> > -------------
> > This just represents my personal opinion. It doesn't represent my
> > employer's opinion from any respective.
> > ----------------
> >
> > In article <7qgphk$mjr$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
> > Todder <toddbrasseur_at_my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > How do you check data integrity when two columns are related but
not
> > in
> > > the same table?
> > >
> > > An example would be having a system which keeps track of
automobile
> > > inventory. In one table (Master) you have the serial number,
> > > manufacturer, etc. In another table (Detail) you have the serial
> > > number (Foreign Key), color, etc. Each manufacturer has its own
> list
> > > of colors that it uses. So when a serial number and color is
> entered,
> > > you need to verify that the color is allowed for the manufacturer
of
> > > the automobile. My idea was to pass the serial number to a stored
> > > procedure that finds the manufacturer (from the header) and passes
> > back
> > > a list of valid colors.
> > >
> > > The check constraint would look like:
> > >
> > > CHECK (New.Color IN
> > > (SELECT Color FROM StoredProcedure(New.SerialNumber))
> > >
> > > Is this allowed in ORACLE? The database we are currently using
> allows
> > > this to compile but doesn't work.
> > >
> > > If not, how would you accomplish this type of check?
> > >
> > > Thanks in Advance
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
> > >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
> >
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Received on Tue Aug 31 1999 - 14:50:40 CDT
![]() |
![]() |