Re: Oracle #1? Then why are these still missing...

From: Dirk Bellemans <Dirk.Bellemans_at_skynet.belgium>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:57:43 +0200
Message-ID: <7otv3u$bu7$4@news1.skynet.be>

kevin moriarty wrote in message <7nt9eo$cd4$1_at_nnrp03.primenet.com>...
>I'm a newbie; been doing oracle for 3 months. After using access, paradox,
>and oracle I've com to this insight: Oracle is less user friendly, much
>slower to develope in, more difficult to get information on, more expensive
>to use, pays better, and handles large tables better.

I don't agree on everything you write, but the most important is true: it pays better...

Yet, in my experience (haven't tried them all, true) Dev2K is by far the best 4GL available for ordinary business oriented custom development: it is fast, can do almost everything, you can find a collegue with (more) experience and it is easy to write well maintainable code. Can't tell all of that about the competition, IMO.

--
Dirk Bellemans
Modify email address to reply (use .be instead of .belgium) Received on Thu Aug 12 1999 - 02:57:43 CDT