Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.server:58246
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!netnews.com!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!dca1-feed1.news.digex.net!intermedia!news.ipass.net!not-for-mail
From: "David Sisk" <davesisk@ipass.net>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
References: <932478198.5480.0.nnrp-06.c2d9cf02@news.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Best setting of db_block_size on NT
Lines: 25
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Message-ID: <x7al3.343$w3.501@news.ipass.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:29:50 -0400
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ipass.net
X-Trace: news.ipass.net 932523613 209.170.134.13 (Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:20:13 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 22:20:13 EDT
Organization: iPass.Net

In general, I'd go with an 8K database block size on NT.  The O/S block size
is 2K, but this is too small for most applications, whether OLTP or DSS.

Good luck,

--
David C. Sisk
The Unofficial ORACLE on NT site
http://www.ipass.net/~davesisk/oont.htm


Nick Rumble wrote in message
<932478198.5480.0.nnrp-06.c2d9cf02@news.demon.co.uk>...
>Using a default installation,  Oracle 7.3 on NT uses a db_block_size of 2k.
>
>Is this the best setting or are there "external" factors (such as disk NTFS
>cluster size) that would mean this value should be increased ?
>
>Regards
>
>Nick Rumble
>
>


