Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Index-Organized Tables Bug Found!!!
In article <7lie8b$bb1$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>,
Erik <ecotsonas_at_saraswati.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any real world experience with Index-Organized
tables?
>
> I have 2.5GB of data. A B*Tree index on the primary key uses about
> 2.2GB. It is currently partitioned on a date column for quarters and
> there are a couple of secondary indexes.
>
> I am going to test converting this to an index-organized table, and
was
> just looking for feedback from anyone who might have done something
> like this already.
>
> Known drawbacks:
> I know you can't create secondary bitmap indexes and secondary index
> queries don't execute in parallel currently.
>
> Any pros/cons would be great.
>
> --
> Erik
> Consultant
> Saraswati Systems Corporation - (SSC)
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
Well I found a bug in Oracle 8.1.5 on Digital Unix. When I try to create an index-organized table as follows:
CREATE TABLE EMP_IOT
( EMPNO NUMBER(4) NOT NULL, ENAME VARCHAR2(10), JOB VARCHAR2(9), MGR NUMBER(4), HIREDATE DATE, SAL NUMBER(7,2), COMM NUMBER(7,2),
The insert as select causes an ORA-600 error.
I have been able to create the table be doing a create table as select.
I have sent this to Oracle, but have not gotten a TAR# back yet
--
Erik
Consultant
Saraswati Systems Corporation - (SSC)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Received on Fri Jul 02 1999 - 13:19:51 CDT
![]() |
![]() |