Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Rumours

Re: Rumours

From: Kenneth C Stahl <BluesSax_at_Unforgettable.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 1999 08:32:37 -0400
Message-ID: <377CB164.B9897B05@Unforgettable.com>


I understand what you are saying - however, I also know that Oracle has issued some patches which are specifically aimed at correcting Y2K problems with the rdbms. Obviously these patches are changing something other than the way that the data is stored in tables. That being the case it is still a legitimate question to ask whether there are known Y2K problems with 7.3.3 which have not been and will not be corrected by patches because 7.3.3 has gone non-support.

Ken

Pete Sharman wrote:

> OK, let's travel the road again. Seems I've been down this road a dozen times
> now.
>
> Due to the way Oracle stores dates, the RDBMS in any release of version 8, 7, and
> probably back to the year dot has not had an issue with Y2K, unless there has been
> a bug. The century is always stored.
>
> How your ***application*** deals with displaying it is another issue.
>
Received on Fri Jul 02 1999 - 07:32:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US