Re: Rumours

What about 7.3.2? Is it fully Y2K complient or will it have problems?

Sybrand Bakker wrote:

> Statement by an Oracle support rep in a Dutch Oracle Magazine shows
> otherwise:
> 7.3.3 is not on the Y2k list because it is not supported anymore. This
> doesn't necessarily mean 7.3.3 is not Y2K compliant. In fact it is. They
> deleted it because of the support status.
>
> Hth,
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Oracle DBA
>
> Glenn Baron <gbaron_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
> news:01bec3e4$8c45d860$c74995c1_at_default...
> > Phone call from my boss today .. he was at a Usergroup meeting, and was
> > desperate to know what (exact) version of Oracle we were on. Turns out
> that
> > Oracle U.K. are about to announce that only versions 7.3.4 and higher will
> > be supported from 2000 onwards. Rumours that 7.3.3 and below *might* not
> be
> > entirely Y2K compliant...
> > Hmmm, we'll see
> >
> > Glenn Baron
Received on Thu Jul 01 1999 - 13:59:57 CDT