Re: DB BLOCK BUFFERS on NT

From: <czekala_at_real.pl>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:09:56 GMT
Message-ID: <7kba4q$on1$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

Probably it's only a bug in installation guide. All my databases have more than 32000 db_block_buffers, and one has 300000.

Rafal

In article <7k8d4t$m00$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>, cookr_at_nucorsteel.com wrote:
> I am running Oracle 8.0.3 on a Windows NT Server. I mistakenly changed
> by DB_BLOCK_BUFFERS parameter to 32000 vs 3200. The Database ran
> better than ever (extremely fast), but the Oracle install guide for NT
> says the maximums Buffers is 3200.
> Does anybody know if this will cause any problems or why Oracle says
> only 3200 on NT (Unix/Alpha can use many more)?
> The machine has plenty of RAM available for the SGA, and the Oracle
> instance is definitely using the extra buffers (memory size increased
> to 160MB from 65MB). I have not had any problems in a week with the
> new parameter.
> Thanks.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't. Received on Thu Jun 17 1999 - 12:09:56 CDT