Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: changing rollbacks
Hi Doug,
have You tried a coalesce on the tablespace?
Regards
Ralph Ganszky
In article <374EE970.1164527_at_bigfoot.com>,
Doug Cowles <dcowles_at_bigfoot.com> wrote:
> I could be just tired - but somthing's bugging me. I have three
> rollbacks,
> intitially sized at 70M on datafiles of 1.5 GB each. One tablespace
per
>
> datafile, and one rollback segment for each tablespace. Nothing else
in
>
> the tablespaces but their respective rollbacks.
>
> I wanted to change the intial size of the three rollbacks to 300M, and
> then
> shrink the datafiles to 600M. I dropped the three rollbacks, (which I
> thought
> would clear out the datafiles completely), and then recreated them
with
> the new
> storage parameters. When I try to shrink the datafiles to 600M, it
> tells me
> , ORA-03297: file contains 641 blocks of data beyond the requested
> RESIZE value.
>
> Now, it's Friday, and I'm leaving this one, but instinct tells me if I
> re-create the
> tablespace, everything will be dandy.. but how can this happen? If
I've
> dropped any
> segments that are in that tablespace, corresponding to a rollback
> segment whose
> high water mark never exceeded 300M, why would there be data or
> allocated extents
> floating around the 600M mark??
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Dc.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Received on Sat May 29 1999 - 13:24:02 CDT
![]() |
![]() |