Re: SQL server Vs Oracle

Do your really think you all are proving anything here or convincing anybody about anything except for the size of your own egos?

Point blank, each person is of the opinion that there product is the best and everyone else is an unwashed heathen. Who on earth is clueless enough to think there is any point in continuing this thread?

Michael

Billy Verreynne <vslabs_at_onwe.co.za> wrote in message news:7h60af$g2p$1_at_hermes.is.co.za...
> Eric Johnson wrote in message

<7gvdt4$p9d$1_at_nnrp1.deja.com>...
> > While Oracle is a good solution I think the answer is
SQL. I have both
> >environments in our enterprise and the disadvantage is
Oracle. Planning and
> >developement generally come with a large disadvantage..
>
> Planning and development a disadvantage??? Heaven forbids.
And you are
> actually envolved in enterprise computing!? <shudder>
>
> >Oracle dba's in my
> >experience have ego's that are dwarfed only by the
consulting pricetag that
> >comes with them.
>
> Ah, so there we have it. You have a very specific opinion
about Oracle DBAs
> and then this opinion rubs of on Oracle too...
>
> My guess it is something to do with post traumatic
database disorder after
> the shock of working with a -real- database like Oracle.
And then more than
> just a tad of jealously because the industry recognises
the skills of Oracle
> professional and will pay for it. Unlike the dime o' dozen
of these MCP's
> you get who believes themselves to be real experts (look
at my shiny MCP
> certificate!) and that the industry should actually pay
them more....
>
>
>
> regards,
> Billy
>
>
>
Received on Mon May 10 1999 - 02:08:58 CDT