Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SQL server Vs Oracle
While Oracle is a good solution I think the answer is SQL. I have both
environments in our enterprise and the disadvantage is Oracle. Planning and
developement generally come with a large disadvantage.. Oracle dba's in my
experience have ego's that are dwarfed only by the consulting pricetag that
comes with them. It is not an out of the box solution and odds are you wont
get through a deployment strategy without someone trying to sell you an "X"
type platform for true scalablity and the admin service with it. Think about
this: NT 4.0 box with hardware level raid, put the sql databases on different
disks than the OS. The disks the database lie on should be raid 1 for best
throughput. Use the MS upsizing tool for access and move a copy of the access
db into sql, recreate a few forms and links and see what you come up with. If
you have a resource on your staff that understands MS software in general,
the documentation is relatively easy to follow. Spend a few days in an MS
training class and give it a go. Don't get sold on a mystical solution that
only an outsider understands, hired guns are just that, and have generally
little loyalty to the company the are working for this week....
Eric
--
That which does not kill us makes us stronger
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Received on Fri May 07 1999 - 14:11:38 CDT
![]() |
![]() |