Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SQL server Vs Oracle
To quote a posting in another thread:
"The recent Microsoft Knowledge Base article Q225141 of 27-APR-1999 says that executing a query with a union can cause an error.
The suggested workaround is to not use union. Instead one should create a stored procedure that inserts the records from each select into a temporary table, and then change the query to select from that temp table."
This type of bug is the reason that I, for one, prefer to have nothing to do with SQL Server. Here we have basic SQL functionality that doesn't work.
What else slipped past their "quality control"?
If I dare to use SQL Server am I going to come in one morning and discover that my database is scrambled beyond redemption and that my backups corrupted?
I make my living as a DBA. As such my first responsibility is to assure the integrity of the data in my databases. It really doesn't matter if an RDBMS is faster, cheaper, easier to manage or whatever if it cannot guarantee the integrity of the data it contains.
regards
Jerry Gitomer
![]() |
![]() |