Xref: alice comp.databases.oracle.server:48398
Path: alice!news-feed.fnsi.net!netnews.com!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!24.93.67.47!cyclone.southeast.rr.com!newse1.tampabay.rr.com!newse3.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3730FECF.7F88024@pobox.com>
From: John Seitz <seitz@pobox.com>
Reply-To: seitz@pobox.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Oracle vs SQL server
References: <19990505112119.17135.00002363@ng18.aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 02:29:32 GMT
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@tampabay.rr.com
X-Trace: newse3.tampabay.rr.com 925957772 24.92.215.28 (Wed, 05 May 1999 22:29:32 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 22:29:32 EDT
Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay

Personally this is how I feel about the Oracle/NT debate.  Customer outgrows Oracle
on a NT box.  Get a Unix box (which does a better job then NT for app servers), and
put Oracle on it.  No matter what NT people say, NT is not created for HUGE
database.  I don't think the reliability is there.  So with Oracle you have a
choice of what OS you run on.  With SQLServer, you have to stick with NT.

Don't get me wrong, I will always use NT for small to medium to even large DB.  NT
is easy to setup, and administrate.  But I would never use SQL Server, because I
like having a choice of what OS I want to run.  I'm almost to the point of not
using NT also.  My Linux Oracle server so far rocks.

John


Masjid1 wrote:

> This is not an attempt to start a flame war. Or a mine is better contest. I was
> recently reading an article comparing the two databases and the author said
> both programs  were good and  that each could be used various  situations
> interchangeably but the author said this is true in only 95% percent of the
> cases. My question is what area (mainly the 5%)  is beyond  SQL server's
> abilities. I apologise if this questions has been asked and answered. Thank you
> in advance

