Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: SQL server Vs Oracle

Re: SQL server Vs Oracle

From: Jerry Gitomer <jgitomer_at_hbsrx.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 13:01:05 -0400
Message-ID: <7gnh5l$c8v$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>


Hi Ling,

If you are satisfied with your present Access database and are upgrading in order to gain capacity and speed this is a no brainer -- stay with Microsoft, go with SQL*Server.

I say this because if your needs have satisfied by Access it is unlikely that you will grow to the point where you need Oracle's scalability and stability. And, of course, if you do eventually outgrow SQL*Server your upgrade to Oracle will be relatively painless.

regards

Jerry Gitomer



Ling wrote in message ...
>Hi all,
>Our project team is looking into upsizing a VB/Access database to either MS
>SQL Server/ Oracle on NT. We don't know what their main differences are and
>which one we should use. Any information regarding this subject or any
>recommendation will be very appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Ling
>
>
Received on Tue May 04 1999 - 12:01:05 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US