Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Best aproach for multiplatform RDBMS development

Re: Best aproach for multiplatform RDBMS development

From: <pbor8198_at_my-dejanews.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 15:26:22 GMT
Message-ID: <7g20ip$hba$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>


Hi,

I'm working on a project that needs a object mapping tool. For this we use Rogue Wave's dbtools and RW-Metro.

Perhaps it has some nice features for you also, go check it out.

http://www.roguewave.com/products/

Paul.

In article <7fg4du$vvv$1_at_nnrp1.dejanews.com>,   bmaccion_at_greenacres.com wrote:
> One transaction a second is rather funny. I'm working with a system that is
> running about 250,000,000 sql transactions/day (you do the math). Granted
> this isn't SQL7 or Access and we're also about 70% idle (ummm, smp
> hardware). Oh yea, it's on ~20G of data so it's a fair amount of data (not a
> warehouse mind you)
>
> The catch here is that _my_ realtime isn't necessary _your_ realtime. We
> don't use any stored procedures but that's just the way I like it. I hate
> triggers and stored procedures but that's because I'm old and still think
> that the database should just store and fetch data.
>
> Our systems have a code layer between the application code and the database,
> this allows us to handle different databases at the code level and not with
> stored procedures.
>
> bobm
>
> btw: Teradata doesn't have _real_ stored procedures yet so be careful what
> database features you use if you want to be portable. (although the ESQL_C
> from teradata really really stinks too).
>
> In article <19990415074046.20809.00000092_at_ngol08.news.cs.com>,
> jplahman_at_cs.comnospam (Jplahman) wrote:
> > In article
> > <Pine.LNX.4.04.9904071012180.28952-100000_at_reflections.eng.mindspring.net>,
> Todd
> > Graham Lewis <tlewis_at_mindspring.net> writes:
> >
> > >"real time performance"? Really?
> >
> > Please define real time. The reason I ask is we receive data (1200 integer
> > variables) from a plant control system at 55msec (or 18 samples /sec). We
are
> > just now looking at converting our legacy application to a database like
> Oracle
> > because we were always told that a database engine cannot keep up with this
> > high rate of data. The fastest it can handle data is one transaction / sec.
> >
> > JPL
> >
> > jplahman_at_cs.com
> >
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own Received on Mon Apr 26 1999 - 10:26:22 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US