Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Replication again

Re: Replication again

From: jack dectis <oradba_at_erols.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 03:54:12 +0000
Message-ID: <37004AE3.D5EAD589@erols.com>


If the machines are physically close maybe you could give each another
network card and run an ethernet cable between them. They would have no network contention
then and you wouldn't have to touch the rest of the net.

Pete Sharman wrote:

> Denis
>
> Yep. Upgrade the network ;)
>
> I have seen some clients who have slow networks that are not possible to
> upgrade get around this problem by basically building their own
> replication using ftp. Of course, conflict handling etc. all needs to
> be written by you, so it's not an easy or pretty solution. If you can't
> upgrade the network, I'd look at doing some serious tuning of the
> replication OR move to a later release of the database. Performance
> just keeps on improving as the new releases come out.
>
> HTH.
>
> Pete
>
> Denis I. Sizov wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > The story is:
> > slo-o-ow network and a need of replication between
> > two O7.3.2 servers
> >
> > The problem is:
> > snapshots do not provide data propagation in an acceptable time.
> > So could anybody to recommend ANY possible solution for that?
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> Pete
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Peter Sharman Email: psharman_at_us.oracle.com
> WISE Course Development Manager Phone: +1.650.607.0109 (int'l)
>
> Worldwide Internal Services Education (650)607 0109 (local)
> San Francisco
>
> SQL> select standard_disclaimer, witty_remark
> 2 from company_requirements;
>
> Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle
> Corporation
>
> "Controlling application developers is like herding cats."
> Kevin Loney, ORACLE DBA Handbook
> "Oh no it's not! It's much harder than that!"
> Bruce Pihlamae, long term ORACLE DBA
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Received on Mon Mar 29 1999 - 21:54:12 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US