Re: Of true, false and function names.

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 08:44:24 -0000
Message-ID: <918290721.22567.0.nnrp-04.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

Just a guess, but you could try:

        standard.true
        standard.false

since true and false are probably declared in package standard

Jonathan Lewis
Yet another Oracle-related web site: www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Francis Small wrote in message <79frb4$e3b_at_canyon.sr.hp.com>...
>My application needs to have character representations for TRUE and FALSE,
>so in one of my packages (FScon) I came up with two cleverly named
>functions: FScon.true and FScon.false. Outside of the FScon package, no p
>problem. But *inside* the FScon package, guess what... the literals true
>and false have now been redefined to reference the FScon functions. Is
>there anyway, besides renaming the functions, of referencing the PL/SQL
>boolean values of TRUE and FALSE?
>
> Francis
>
>--
>| . . . . 5 . . . . 10. . . . 15. . . . 20. . . . 25. . . . 30. . . . 35. .
.
>Padres Francis Small - M/S M1RA
>Giants Test Engineering
>Bums Microwave Instruments
Div.
>Rockies telnet 794-3305
>Diamondbacks fthes_at_sr.hp.com
>******************** Only 59 days left until Opening Day

---

Received on Sat Feb 06 1999 - 02:44:24 CST