Re: Optimal db_block_size

Peter Sharman wrote:

> There has been some work done by Oracle's System Performance Group on this
> question. From memory, their determination was that you should almost never
> use 2K (of course, that's the default!), and there are few situations where a
> block size less than 8K is valuable. As you say, larger sizes still are good
> for DSS.
>

Do you remember if it said anything about what the O/S filesystem block size should be?

Guy Received on Fri Feb 05 1999 - 16:37:58 CST