Rollback Segments vs direct=true/sqlldr

Oracle 8.04 solaris

I've had problems before using sqlldr with 'replace' in the ctl file--in that my rollback segments weren't able to extend sufficiently. I thought I could bypass the rollback segments using direct=true. But apparently the rollback segments still kick in with 'replace'.

Is there any way to bypass rollback segments with sqlldr?

Thanks!

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own Received on Fri Jan 22 1999 - 15:41:05 CST