Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle on unix or NT

Re: Oracle on unix or NT

From: jhon setler <bogers07_at_worldonline.nl>
Date: 19 Dec 1998 20:59:13 GMT
Message-ID: <01be2b92$2c7c0f20$17e6f1c3@msn01>


I had a project migrating an OTL (online transaction system) application from os2 TO WINDOWS nt4.0
at ricoh espc in amsterdam holland. NT40 clogged up when about 30 people where
accessing the database concurrently. (adding an extra processor, raid10 controller,
and 256meg (yes!) of memory to the machine didn't help at all. Not even a slight
improvement. (I learned the hard way that NT40 isn't scalable.) After close examination it seems that NT40 stops when to many processes (28 to be exactly) are waiting for blocking IO. The kernel doesn't get any processor time at all,
(flat-line on the task manager monitor)!!

/Jacob

Piotr Kolodziej <pkol_at_otago.gda.pl> schreef in artikel <75b1k8$g7m$1_at_korweta.task.gda.pl>...
> Oracle wrote in message ...
> >If you want a high-performance system in an Intel environment, go with
Linux.
> >I've read of tests where a Linux based P5-133 with 32MB RAM outperformed
a
> >P2-400 with 256MB RAM running NT.
>
>
> Well... I'd like to know what was really compared.
> I don't think that it was tested with running Oracle Server because
> it needs much more memory to achieve acceptable performance.
> So that test results may not be adequate.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Piotr Kolodziej pkol_at_otago.gda.pl
> Just my private opinion.
>
>
>
Received on Sat Dec 19 1998 - 14:59:13 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US