Re: Avoid Windows NT for database server - says the White paper!!

I hope that I am not to late on this but I highly recommend buying S.U.S.E. Linux over Red Hat. I liked Red Hat but I loved S.U.S.E. The ease of installation and plethora (sp) of apps is un-rivaled

Schulers Books

?? $79 dollars if I remember correctly, Full documentation, and the commercial version of the Applix Ware Productivity Suite.

In article <743o66$qnl$1_at_nnrp1.dejanews.com>,   nigel_tufnel_at_my-dejanews.com wrote:
> They may be the Interbase mongers, but I gotta tell you, after all the large
> scale load testing I've done on HP UX boxes and NT, I think they're right. NT
> sucks gerbils through straws by comparison.
>
> My one criticism is that I can't really see any slowdown due to the GUI.
>
> I'm going to have to go buy myself Linux Redhat today I think... :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Nigel
>
> In article <366726de.4402875_at_keeks.ioc.ee>,
> chef_at_roadkillcafe.com (Foxtrot) wrote:
> > On Tue, 01 Dec 1998 21:17:35 +0000, Dev_Al <alavoor_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Windows NT is a resource hog more suitable for graphics and win32 GUI
> > >apps.
> > >
> > >The paper at http://www.interbase.com/tech/icon/index.html says so --->
> >
> > Oh, it's the Interbase doom mongers again. Do not make the mistake of
> > taking them seriously.
> >
> >
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>

--
HBGreen
A.K.A. Brett Selleck
Application Developer
Meijer Inc.

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own