Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: ORACLE vs INFORMIX vs MS SQL SERVER

Re: ORACLE vs INFORMIX vs MS SQL SERVER

From: Didier Quesson <dquesson_at_sofarxmedia.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:58:05 +0100
Message-ID: <726lh3$tod$1@minus.oleane.net>


For a so large amount of data, SQL storage may not be appropriate, while native support by filesystems would be more easy to figure out. In that case you need a very good file server solution, and to integrate a database that provides links to the actual images on the appropriate filesystems. That way, the RDBMS database will be kept small and more easily optimizable for fast indexing of this document database, used for searches and so on. You should really consider separating image storage (may be on multiple file servers) from the RDBMS itself, by using hyperlinks to access them from the database. Then your SQL queries will not retrieve the image data itself but the hyperlinks to the image data files. I suggest a dedicated server for the Web server and the RDBMS, plus multiple file servers to store the actual data. Management of this large database of files may be integrated within the RDBMS data model (which will hold the whole directory of files, but not the data). Data retrieval by the Web server may be operated by CGI or ActiveX scripts which will make search in the database using SQL queries to perform searches in the directory tree, and then will collect the hyperlinks stored in the database to process image data retrieval down to the client. Such a solution is then very extensible, because it does not limit the number of file servers which will process file data retrievals. Received on Sun Nov 08 1998 - 05:58:05 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US