Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Block Size and Checkpoints (NT)

Re: Block Size and Checkpoints (NT)

From: scooby <scooby.do_at_shaggynet.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1998 11:28:06 +0100
Message-ID: <361F36B6.4607@shaggynet.com>


fatman_at_pobox.com wrote:
>
> Could someone help me with block sizes for Oracle 7.3 under NT 4? I'm
> quite new to both NT and Oracle, so please forgive me if the answers
> seem obvious.
>
> I'm using a 4 GB disk (NTFS). I believe the OS block size (called
> 'cluster' I think) for disks of that size under NT is 4 kB, but I'm not
> sure. How do I find out?
>
> The recommended value for Oracle's DB_BLOCK_SIZE parameter for small
> databases is 2 kB. Now I wonder, is it really ok to use a smaller DB
> block size than the actual OS block size (in my case presumably 4 kB)?
>
> Lastly, I want my checkpoints to occur only at logswitches (that's
> actually why I started looking into block sizes). It seems there are
> two different parameters which achieve this:
>
> a) setting LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL to a number larger than there are OS
> blocks in the redo log file
> b) setting LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT to zero.
>
> Do I have to use both parameters or is it enough to set one of them? What's
> the difference between the two parameters/methods?
>
> Thank you very much in advance
>
> Fatman
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Regarding block size I run our NT based Oracle databases with a block size of 2K with no problems. I have been told that the db block size and os block size are not necessarily directly related under NT

Regarding checkpoints I made our LOG_CHECKPOINT_INTERVAL > Redo log size and can confirm that the database only checkpoints at redo log switches. I have never set the value LOG_CHECKPOINT_TIMEOUT so this must be at it's default setting (whatever that is).

Hope this helps.

Regarding Received on Sat Oct 10 1998 - 05:28:06 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US