Re: Oracle 7 performance on Nt or UX

If you don't mind, can you give us some specifics regarding model numbers and configurations of your HP/UX and NT servers?

Terry Dykstra [TeamPS] wrote:

> We've moved our database from hp-ux to nt, using Oracle Workgroups (way
> cheaper than Enterprise). Our tables range from just 10 to 5 million rows.
> Performance has been very good. On the downside, Oracle is not as stable as
> the unix version.
>
> --
> Terry Dykstra [TeamPS]
> Canadian Forest Oil Ltd.
> See you at the Powersoft Conference in L.A.
> http://www.sybase.com/Events/psuc98/index.html
>
> John Ma wrote in message <35BF6B74.C5_at_hp.com>...
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >Currently, we plan to move our Oracle database server to a new box. We
> >try to evaluate buying HP-UX or Window NT and find out performance/$$
> >ratio. on different options.
> >
> >Our database has about 40 tables; 3 tables has around 60,000 rows, all
> >others are about 1,000 to 10,000 rows. Select and Insert/Update are
> >equally the same hit. Currently we have 50 Oracle workgroup licenses on
> >Window NT.
> >
> >Does anyone has some suggestions? or does anyone knows some benchmark
> >result I can reserach on? Any information will help. I am really
> >appreciated. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >John
Received on Sat Aug 01 1998 - 15:12:38 CDT