Re: RAID-3 v. RAID-5

No mention of RAID-3 by the sys admin -- was going to benchmark between non-RAID and RAID. If I do any testing (maybe during the Y2K cycle!) I'll post results, and get the correct RAID terminology from sys admin.

In article <3593c67f.12001044_at_news.dvol.com>,   chuckh_at_dvol.com (Chuck Hamilton) wrote:
>
> On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 05:07:33 GMT, shreterh_at_my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> >Also, we've been hashing over whether RAID is slower per Oracle performance
> >canon. After much reading and discussion, we concluded that the newer cache
> >controllers eliminate mostly all the performance difference between RAID and
> >nonRAID. In any event, we aren't showing disk problems right now, and we can
> >always move redo, temp, rollbacks around later if we want to.
>
> Have you ever done any benchmarking between RAID-5 and RAID-3? If so,
> what were your results.
> --
> Chuck Hamilton
> chuckh_at_dvol.com
>
> If at first you don't succeed, sky diving isn't for you.
>

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading Received on Thu Jun 25 1998 - 22:23:16 CDT